Showing posts with label the Battle of Hastings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the Battle of Hastings. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

1066, Here Come the Normans, Part I

Harold, the Earl of Wessex's land prior to being crowned King of England

King Harold II of England



1066, Here Come the Normans, Part I

If you can only remember one date in all the fascinating history of Britain.  Remember 1066!  A reminder:  Against my better judgment and through nearly faultless research and painstaking scribbles that led my faithful readers through thousands of years of British history, I bring you to the year that everything changed.

Yes, of course, in the relentless march of time, whether we’re speaking of changes in climate, or the miraculous splitting of continents, or the decline and fall of bellbottom trousers, changes occur.  But some changes are more immediate and dramatic than others.  1066 was both.

In the case of Britain, I’ve taken you from Pre-Roman times, to Roman times, the exit of Romans, the rise of the Vikings to the fall of the Vikings.  But, those were petty and temporary changes in Britain compared to what happened next.  For those unfortunates who have not read my previous scintillating prose portrayals of the formation of Britain, I’ve listed the links below.





Now for some odds and ends to prepare you for the most important year in English History!  The dates are all in 1066, and the months are just to help you remember the chronological order of things.  The test consists of keeping track of how many beers you drink while you read this superb encapsulation of “Here Come the Normans.”

5 January – Edward the Confessor, the King of England dies with no heirs and promises William the Duke of Normandy that he will be king. Harold Godwinson another claimant to the throne, but without blood ties to Edward, swears to abide by the King’s decision.  But on his deathbed, the King apparently changed his mind and told Harold that he would be King. There are lots of ends and outs here, but I'm giving you the bare framework.

So what was the connection between Edward the Confessor (King of England) and William the Duke of Normandy?  They shared a bloodline.  Edward’s grandfather was William the Conqueror’s great grandfather.

6 January – Harold Godwinson (Harold II) is proclaimed King

18 September – Norwegian King Harald Hadrada (yet another claimant to the throne of England) invades England from Norway.

20  September – King Hadrada defeats the northern English earls and King Harold’s brother, Tosig Godwinson joins the Norwegian King’s victorious army.  King Harold had exiled his brother previously, so Tosig had a bone to pick.  But he picked the wrong bone.

Harold II rides his army north to meet the invaders.

25 September – Harold II wins the battle of Stamford Bridge.  Both Tosig and the Norwegian King are killed during the battle.

Hooray!  Hooray!  But, wait a second and not so fast, King Harold!

26 September – William, Duke of Normandy has a blood tie claim to the throne of England.  He and his army set sail for the English coast.  Edward the Confessor told me I would be king and Harold swore an oath to support my claim.  Went back on his oath?  Them’s fightin’ words!

Harold, no doubt sensing a problem as big and nasty as a boil on the part of the body that meets the saddle, hurries his army south.

On William’s part there had been many fits and starts before the voyage began.  Troubles were many, including winds and weather and desertions. The number of vessels in the fleet is estimated at between 776 and 1000.
 
William the Duke of Normandy
28 September 1066 - William’s army lands at Pevensey Bay, about 50 miles south-southeast of London. 

Pevensey Bay today

14 October - The Battle of Hastings, which evidently took place nearer the town of Battle, rather than Hastings, will change the direction of Anglo-Saxon England, as well as English life.  The Norman army is victorious.  English King Harold II is killed, reportedly by an arrow in the eye.  However, an arrow through the eye was the customary death for someone who broke his oath, so the report may have been changed to conform with custom. Some historians believe he was clubbed to death. No one knows where he is buried.

Ok, you’ve got the date and the name of the battle, but let’s examine what the battle was like.

First some interesting facts from Britain Magazine.  If you’re an anglophile, as I am, can’t recommend this magazine highly enough!

The first man killed in the battle was Taillefer, William’s jester.  Here’s how it happened.  Taillefer ran out in front and taunted the English by singing the Chanson de Roland and juggling with his sword.  An English soldier ran out to confront him and was slain.  Taillefer then charged the English line and was overwhelmed.  Guess the jester didn’t get the last laugh.

During the battle, both sides took a break for lunch.  On the French side, lunch included much wine and carnal satisfaction, hence the name, William the Conqueror.   (Ok, I made that part up, but they did take a lunch break.)

It wasn’t a fair fight.  Really?  What commander wants a fair fight? The English army was a few thousand men short, numbering about 5,000, mostly on foot, with a few archers.  The larger French army, about 15,000 men. was supported by archers and about one fourth of the army was cavalry.

In truth, the sizes of the armys are estimates.  For Harold, 5000 to 7000 troops.  For William, 10,000 to 15,000 troops.
 
The layout of the Battle of Hastings, with the English Army in Red.

Still the English put up a good fight and Harold II had a great plan.  First, he took the high ground and a defensive position, and set up a shield wall. Harold warned his troops, who were both outnumbered and weary from the long march south, to simply hold the line and not to waiver. He expected a northern army to arrive with fresh troops.
 
The English view of the battlefield looking down the hill.
The Norman view of the battlefield looking up the hill

The battle began about 9 a.m. The Normans attacked with cavalry and were repulsed. Several more attacks met with the same result.  About 1 p.m., while attacking the English right flank (Norman left flank) the Normans took heavy losses and apparently instead of withdrawing in an orderly fashion, they ran.  Thinking the Normans were close to defeat, the English right flank pursued rapidly. There was also a rumor that William had been killed.  Not so!  William mounted a second house and rode down his line with his helmet shield raised to prove he was alive.

Seeing the English racing after his fleeing troops, William sent his cavalry to cut the English off, and trapped them in the open.  With the English right flank decimated, William took advantage, attacking all across the English front.  In the end, he did something very clever.  With few arrows left, he told his archers to wait until the Norman troops were almost at the English line, then to fire high in the air. 

The English shield line could not use shields to defend against both on-coming foot soldiers and arrows raining down from on high.  In the end, the Saxon army was crushed.

By dusk the battle was over. The northern army Harold counted on never arrived.  The days of Anglo-Saxon hegemony were over.  England belonged to the Normans.

On Christmas Day 1066, William was crowned King of England in the newly built Westminster Abby, London.

A Map showing the whole sequence of events up to the crowning of William the Conquerer

King William's holdings after the conquest of England

Next we’ll look at life under the Normans and the new direction of English history.

Meanwhile:  Want to know about the weapons at the Battle of Hastings and the Shield Wall?  http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/learn/1066-and-the-norman-conquest/the-weaponry-of-1066/  




Tuesday, March 20, 2018

The Vikings in Britain, Part II





The Vikings in Britain, Part II

866 marks a year of change from raiding to settling. Danes and Norwegians were the most purposeful raiders and in the next hundred years, they established cities, including what we now call York, and with the help of their allies, mainly Saxon tribes, they built kingdoms.  Raiding declined.  Not profitable to raid the neighborhood if it’s already your neighborhood.

England became somewhat united under joint rule of Norse and Anglo-Saxon Kings.  However, under the weakness of English kings (I promised to keep this short, so I won’t name all the kings and battles, such as Edward the Martyr and Ætheired the Unready – yes those names are real) the Vikings began raiding again.  In 1002, Ætheired had had enough of the Danes raiding and ravaging and proclaimed that all Danes living in England would be executed.  This became known as The Saint Brice’s Day Massacre.   As you might guess, the Danes took this very unkindly and eventually the Danish King Cnut became King of England.

The Viking Farewell 1066

1066 is one of the most famous dates in British history.  The Norman king, William the Conqueror, invaded Britain’s southern coast and won the famous Battle of Hastings.  The Viking age was rapidly coming to an end, but it's also startling to discover that William himself was descended from Viking invaders.

A small portion of the Bayeux Tapestry, a woven history of the Battle of Hastings, still found in Bayeux, Normandy, France

The Vikings played a very important role in William the Conqueror’s victory.  How so?  In the north of England, King Harold Hardrata of Norway and his English ally defeated the Anglo-Saxon forces.  England’s King Harold II raced his army north and repelled the Norwegian invasion.  

Danish King Cnut

English King Harold II

Unfortunately, when Harold raced back to the south coast, he was outmanned and outgunned…..no they didn’t have guns, but I love that phrase.  Harold II died at the Battle of Hastings and a Norman, best known as William the Conqueror, established himself on the English throne.  In the next installment, we’ll see what having a Norman (French) meant to English history.

William the Conqueror 

More about the Vikings.

Here’s a headline, literally.  The Vikings did not wear helmets with horns on top.  That part of Viking dress was invented by the German composer Richard Wagner in the mid 19th Century.  According to what I’ve read, only one authentic Viking helmet has been uncovered and it was iron and leather.



What did they wear?  Lots of animals skins.  But, there were differences based on wealth.  The more affluent wore linen and even silk from Asia. The rich may have had larger farms and slaves to work the land and grow the flax (linen).  The poorer folks didn’t wear silk and probably more wool than linen, sheep being much easier to raise. Women and men wore wool and linen, but the women’s wear was wrapped cloth, often with a couple of layers, and held up with broaches and such.

So, what is a kirtle?  A kirtle was a long shirt the men wore that often went down to the knees.  The Viking man in the drawing above is wearing a kirtle.

How big were the Vikings?  I always pictured them as 6 feet four inches, with broad shoulders.  In fact, after examining skeletal remains across Scandinavia, archeologists say the Viking men were about 5 feet 7 3/4 inches tall.  The women were about 5 feet 2 ½ inches.

How about warfare?  What did the men wear?  Some wore chainmail and helmets, with heavy leather vests, or metal, overlapping plates.  They carried axes and broad swords.

Evidence of the Vikings in England.  Archeologists have a difficult time because the Viking settlers lived much as their Anglo-Saxon neighbors did.  Tough to distinguish one house from another, although in rare cases it has been done.

The Vikings fought and ruled and conquered in Britain for about 300 years.  But, they didn’t totally disappear. In some cities, especially in the far north and into Scotland, the people still celebrate their Viking heritage.